Tier 7 · Elite Cert · Module 7.1
Practical self-audit of your live trade log
Audit your own live trading the way a professional reviewer would — data integrity, risk compliance, rule adherence, statistics against benchmarks, costs, and behaviour — using a scored checklist.
Lesson 2 of 2 · 5 min read
The practical part of the Elite Cert is an audit of your own live trading record. You'll review it as a strict, independent reviewer would: are the records complete and accurate, did every trade respect your risk rules, did you follow your system, and do the results match what your testing predicted? The standard is honesty and rigour — a modest record audited thoroughly is worth far more than an impressive one that can't be verified.
What you'll learn
- What a professional trade-log audit checks
- The six audit areas and their pass criteria
- A scoring rubric you can apply to your own record
- How to document findings and corrective actions
- What "passing" your self-audit means
1. Scope
Sample: at least 100 live trades, or at least three months of live trading for slower strategies — whichever is larger in time. Use a live or funded account (see Run a live or funded trial with full audit trail).
Materials: broker statements, trade journal, screenshots, system document with version history, and (for automated systems) logs.
2. The six audit areas
A. Data integrity
- Every trade in the broker statements appears in the journal, and vice versa
- Prices, sizes, and fees match actual fills
- Deposits and withdrawals recorded; returns correctly adjusted (see Record-keeping, tax basics, performance reporting)
B. Risk compliance
- Every trade had a stop-loss at entry
- Risk per trade never exceeded the plan (allowing only for slippage)
- Daily, weekly, and total-open-risk limits were never breached
- Drawdown tiers were applied as written
C. Rule adherence
- Share of trades with no mistake tags (target: at least 90%)
- Deviations documented with their R impact
D. Performance against benchmark
- Expectancy, win rate, average win and loss, and maximum drawdown compared with the forward-test benchmark
- Any significant gap explained
E. Costs and execution
- Total costs as a share of gross profit
- Average slippage versus assumptions
F. Behaviour
- Cost of mistakes by tag (see Behavioral journaling)
- Evidence that circuit breakers worked when triggered
3. Scoring rubric
Score each area 0–2:
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 2 | Fully meets the standard; evidence complete |
| 1 | Minor gaps, documented and corrected |
| 0 | Significant gaps, or evidence missing |
Pass standard (suggested): at least 10 out of 12, with no zero in Data integrity or Risk compliance. Those two areas are non-negotiable: a record you can't trust, or one that breaks its own risk rules, can't pass regardless of profit.
Worked example
(Illustrative audit of 124 live trades.)
| Area | Finding | Score |
|---|---|---|
| A. Data integrity | Two journal entries missing, found and added; all fills reconciled | 1 |
| B. Risk compliance | All trades had stops; one trade at 1.3% risk because of a sizing error, documented | 1 |
| C. Rule adherence | 92% adherence; deviations documented | 2 |
| D. Benchmark | Expectancy +0.14R vs +0.15R forward test; drawdown within range | 2 |
| E. Costs | Costs 18% of gross profit; slippage in line with assumptions | 2 |
| F. Behaviour | moved-stop eliminated after month 1; circuit breakers triggered and followed 4 times | 2 |
| Total | 10 / 12 — pass |
Note that the pass doesn't depend on large profits. It depends on a trustworthy record that shows controlled risk and consistent execution of a tested edge.
4. Documenting findings
For every score below 2, write:
- Finding — what was wrong
- Impact — in R and money
- Cause — why it happened
- Corrective action — what changes, and how you'll verify it
Keep the audit report with your trading records. Repeat the audit every six to twelve months — it's a professional habit, not a one-time exam.
Common mistakes
- Auditing too small a sample.
- Scoring generously on data integrity or risk compliance.
- Judging the record by profit rather than by the six areas.
- Findings without corrective actions.
- Treating the audit as a one-off.
Key terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Trade-log audit | A structured review of a trading record's accuracy, risk, and consistency |
| Data integrity | Completeness and accuracy of trading records |
| Risk compliance | Adherence to all risk limits |
| Scoring rubric | A defined scale for rating each audit area |
| Corrective action | A specific change made in response to an audit finding |
Practice
- Gather your materials for at least 100 live trades or three months.
- Work through areas A–F and score each 0–2.
- Write findings and corrective actions for every score below 2.
- If you meet the pass standard, complete the Elite Cert exam's practical confirmation honestly.
Quick recap
- Audit at least 100 live trades or three months.
- Review data integrity, risk compliance, adherence, benchmark, costs, and behaviour.
- Score each area 0–2; data integrity and risk compliance must not score zero.
- Document findings, impact, cause, and corrective action.
- A trustworthy, controlled record is the standard — not headline profit.
Educational content only — not financial advice. Trading involves substantial risk of loss. Practise on a demo account before risking real money.
Track your progress
Mark lessons complete, see your Elite Cert progress, and move up the 7-tier path.
Continue in Trading School