Tier 6 · Master · Module 6.1
Multi-Asset Portfolio Management
Managing risk across currencies, indices, commodities, and crypto as one portfolio — risk budgeting, volatility-based sizing, correlation-aware allocation, rebalancing, and portfolio-level drawdown control.
Lesson 5 of 5 · 5 min read
At this level, the question shifts from "is this a good trade?" to "is this a good addition to my portfolio?" Multi-asset portfolio management treats all your positions — across currencies, indices, commodities, and crypto — as one book with one risk budget. It's how professional money managers think, and it draws on every risk lesson in Tiers 1–5.
What you'll learn
- Thinking in portfolios instead of individual trades
- Risk budgeting across asset classes and strategies
- Volatility-based sizing so each position contributes comparable risk
- Correlation-aware allocation and rebalancing
- Portfolio-level drawdown control
1. Thinking in portfolios
A single trade is judged by its setup. A portfolio is judged by how positions work together:
- Do they share a hidden driver (see Portfolio-level risk)?
- Does the portfolio still make sense if one theme fails?
- Is risk spread across independent sources of return?
2. Risk budgeting
Decide how much total risk you'll run, then allocate it deliberately.
(Illustrative risk budget for a $100,000 portfolio.)
| Budget item | Allocation |
|---|---|
| Maximum total open risk | 4% ($4,000) |
| Per asset class | FX 1.5% · Indices 1.25% · Commodities 0.75% · Crypto 0.5% |
| Per theme (e.g. "USD weakness") | Maximum 1.5% |
| Per strategy | Trend system 2% · Mean-reversion system 1% · Discretionary 1% |
The budget forces choices. When a new opportunity appears and the relevant bucket is full, you either skip it or replace a weaker position.
3. Volatility-based sizing
Assets have very different volatility. A 1% move in EUR/USD is large; in Bitcoin it's routine. Sizing every position at the same notional amount means the most volatile assets dominate your risk.
Volatility-based sizing sets each position so it contributes similar risk — typically using ATR or a similar volatility measure to set stops, then sizing each from the same risk amount (see Volume and volatility indicators).
Worked example
(Illustrative. Risk per position $400.)
| Asset | Stop (1.5 × daily ATR) | Resulting position |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 90 pips | ≈ 0.44 lots |
| XAU/USD | $45 | 0.089 → round down to 0.08 lots |
| S&P 500 (MES) | 90 points × $5 = $450 per contract | 0 contracts at $400 → skip or widen budget |
| BTC | $3,000 | ≈ 0.13 BTC notional |
Each position risks the same $400, even though their notional sizes and volatility differ enormously. The MES line also shows a real constraint: sometimes the minimum contract size is too large for the budget.
4. Correlation-aware allocation and rebalancing
- Allocate across low-correlation sources: for example, trend-following in commodities and mean-reversion in equity indices.
- Recheck correlations monthly over a recent window (see Correlation across your market and adjacent markets).
- Rebalance risk, not just capital: as positions move, their risk changes (especially after trailing stops or big volatility shifts). Review and resize periodically.
5. Portfolio-level drawdown control
Apply the tiered drawdown plan (see Drawdown control and equity curve management) to the whole portfolio:
- Measure drawdown on total equity, not per position.
- Reduce the overall risk budget at thresholds (for example, cut the maximum total open risk from 4% to 2% at a 6% portfolio drawdown).
- Reduce first where evidence is weakest — strategies below their benchmarks.
Who it suits
| May suit you if… | May not if… |
|---|---|
| You understand several markets | You're still mastering one |
| You're organised and enjoy structure | You dislike spreadsheets and reviews |
| Your capital supports several positions at sensible sizes | Minimum sizes force oversized risk in some markets |
Common beginner mistakes
- Equal notional sizing across assets with very different volatility.
- Diversifying on paper while holding one hidden theme.
- No overall risk budget.
- Ignoring rebalancing as positions and volatility change.
- Measuring drawdown per trade instead of for the portfolio.
Key terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Portfolio | All positions considered together |
| Risk budget | Pre-set limits on total risk and its allocation |
| Volatility-based sizing | Sizing positions so each contributes similar risk |
| Rebalancing | Adjusting positions to keep risk in line with the budget |
| Stress test | Estimating losses in an adverse scenario |
| Portfolio drawdown | Fall in total equity from its peak |
Practice
- Write a risk budget for your account: total, per asset class, per theme, per strategy.
- Size three positions in different asset classes with the same risk amount, using ATR-based stops.
- Run a simple risk-off stress test on your current or hypothetical portfolio.
- Add portfolio-level drawdown thresholds to your trading plan.
Quick recap
- Judge positions by how they fit the portfolio.
- Set a risk budget by asset class, theme, and strategy.
- Use volatility-based sizing so each position contributes comparable risk.
- Allocate across low-correlation sources and rebalance risk regularly.
- Control drawdown at the portfolio level.
Educational content only — not financial advice. Trading involves substantial risk of loss. Practise on a demo account before risking real money.
